SoNet Blog

Social Networking research group in FBK

Follow me on TwitterRSS Feeds

  • Home
  • About

MIT Press book “The Reputation Society” (containing a chapter by me) is out!

Jan 24th

Posted by paolo in book

No comments

The MIT Press I contributed to with a chapter is out! It is titled “The Reputation Society: how online opinions are reshaping the offline world” and edited by Hassan Masum and Mark Tovey.
It is available on MIT press and on Amazon.
The chapter I wrote is titled Trust It Forward: Tyranny of the Majority or Echo Chambers? and on it I ramble about objectivity/subjectivity, minorities/majorities, etc.

If reputation systems weight all perspectives similarly, they may devolve into simple majority rule. But if they give each user reputation scores that take only other similar users’ opinions into account, they run the risk of becoming “echo chambers” in which like-minded people reinforce each others’ views without being open to outside perspectives. Massa discusses design choices and trust metrics that may help balance these two extremes and the broader implication for our future societies.

the reputation society book cover The book received endorsements by people I really admire.
“As our societies expand from local villages to global networks, our ways of assessing and sharing reputation—the foundation of trust and community—must also evolve, but how? The thoughtful and thought-provoking essays in The Reputation Society bring a wide range of perspectives to this question, including the design of technological solutions, applications in philanthropy, science and governance, and warnings about the loss of privacy and autonomy. It is a fascinating collection of readings not only for scholars, but for anyone interested in the dynamics of the reviews and recommendations that shape our decisions—or in the future of how we will judge and be judged.”
—Judith Donath, Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University

“Today is tomorrow’s yesterday. These provocative essays, by some of the leading thinkers in the domain of reputation systems, illuminate how reputations regulate actions across time and social distance and point to the opportunities and obstacles that reputation systems present for commerce and democracy.”
—Paul Resnick, Professor, University of Michigan School of Information

“The Reputation Society enriches the discussion of reputation by bringing together technologists, philosophers, legal scholars, and industry leaders to sort through the promise and perils we face today. It covers the practical, for those interested in the nuts and bolts of the challenges we face today, and the theoretical, for those looking to engage in broader discussions of the ethical and moral concerns. In short, a terrific and enlightening read!”
—Danielle Keats Citron, Professor of Law, University of Maryland School of Law

The list of my co-authors is also very delightful.
Trust, reputation systems, and the immune system of democracy / Craig Newmark –
Building the reputation society / Hassan Masum, Mark Tovey, & Yi-Cheng Zhang –
Designing reputation systems for the social web / Chrysanthos Dellarocas –
Web reputation systems and the real world / Randy Farmer –
An inquiry into effective reputation and rating systems / John Henry Clippinger –
The biology of reputation / John Whitfield –
Regulating reputation / Eric Goldman –
Less regulation, more reputation / Lior Strahilevitz –
The role of reputation systems in managing online communities / Cliff Lampe –
Attention philanthropy : giving reputation a boost / Alex Steffen –
Making use of reputation systems in philanthropy / Marc Maxson & Mari Kuraishi –
The measurement and mismeasurement of science / Michael Nielsen –
Usage-based reputation metrics in science / Victor Henning, Jason Hoyt, and Jan Reichelt –
Open access and academic reputation / John Willinsky –
Reputation-based governance and making states “legible” to their citizens / Lucio Picci –
Trust it forward : tyranny of the majority or echo chambers? / Paolo Massa –
Rating in large-scale argumentation systems / Luca Iandoli, Josh Introne, & Mark Klein –
Privacy, context, and oversharing : reputational challenges in a Web 2.0 world / Michael Zimmer & Anthony Hoffman –
The future of reputation networks / Jamais Cascio –
“I hope you know this is going on your permanent record” / Madeline Ashby & Cory Doctorow.

The cover of the book reads as follows.

In making decisions, we often seek advice. Online, we check Amazon recommendations, eBay vendors’ histories, TripAdvisor ratings, and even our elected representatives’ voting records. These online reputation systems serve as filters for information overload. In this book, experts discuss the benefits and risks of such online tools.

The contributors offer expert perspectives that range from philanthropy and open access to science and law, addressing reputation systems in theory and practice. Properly designed reputation systems, they argue, have the potential to create a “reputation society,” reshaping society for the better by promoting accountability through the mediated judgments of billions of people. Effective design can also steer systems away from the pitfalls of online opinion sharing by motivating truth-telling, protecting personal privacy, and discouraging digital vigilantism.

sonet

Article about Manypedia on Italian newspaper Corriere

Jan 24th

Posted by paolo in corriere

No comments

I’ve been interviewed by the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera about Manypedia (and Wikitrip). If you know Italian, you can read the resulting article titled “Every Wikipedia represents its own culture: even the concept of controversiality is controversial” at corriere.it. The journalist liked to stress the fact both Manypedia and WikiTrip are open source, which is a good thing I think.
Manypedia on corriere.it

sonet

Paolo’s presentation at WikiSym 2011

Nov 10th

Posted by Michela in Arab Spring

No comments

At the beginning of October Paolo flew to California to present our paper on Collective memory building of North African uprisings in Wikipedia at WikiSym 2011. In his presentation, he showed that collective memory building processes happen in Wikipedia, providing evidence of the large participation to the editing of articles and talk pages about the 2011 Egyptian revolution in different language versions of Wikipedia. Through the analysis of millions of edits, it is now possible to study history (also starting from current events), which is written in Wikipedia in a decentralized way by thousands of users.

Paolo proposed possible research directions to study these processes, also from a quantitative perspective, which could fruitfully integrate the qualitative evaluation of articles’ content and discussions in the talk pages. Below you can find he’s presentation:

Enhanced by Zemanta

sonet

My presentation at Wikisym: studying (current) history by analyzing Wikipedia

Nov 9th

Posted by paolo in sonet

No comments

Wikisym was a great conference! Below you can find my presentation about the paper on Collective memory building in Wikipedia. During the presentation, I provided evidence and possible research lines in order to argue how it is becoming possible to study history (of current events) by analyzing what it is written about these events by thousands of editors on Wikipedia.

Collective Memory building in Wikipedia: the case of North African uprisings
sonet

WikiTrip: animated visualization over time of gender and geo-location of Wikipedians who edited a page

Sep 30th

Posted by paolo in sonet

No comments

WikiTrip allows to have a trip in the process of creation of any Wikipedia page from any language edition of Wikipedia. WikiTrip is an interactive web tool empowering its users by providing an insightful visualization of two kinds of information about the Wikipedians who edited the selected page: their location in the world and their gender.

If you want to investigate, for example, where in the world are Wikipedians who edited the page “Peace”, WikiTrip is the right tool. And you can check also the origin of edits for the equivalent page in the Arabic Wikipedia or “Amani” in the Swahili Wikipedia. Moreover, if you have ever wondered if a specific page was edited more by male or female Wikipedians, WikiTrip allows to explore this information as well. How many edits are performed by males and females respectively on Wikipedia on average? What is the page most edited by females? On Wikirip you can explore your own ideas about these questions and more.
Visualization of both information is available over time so that you can appreciate the evolution of the page over years, from its creation up to the present.
More information about WikiTrip at our whitepaper but the best way to enjoy WikiTrip is at http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/.
We would love to hear the Wikipedia pages you found more interesting as they are visualized by WikiTrip and of course we wait for your feedback!

sonet

Wikisym and collective memory building of current events on Wikipedia

Sep 30th

Posted by paolo in sonet

No comments

In few hours I’ll start the long journey towards Mountain View, California, for the Wikisym conference where I’m going to speak about WikiRevolutions presenting the paper “Collective memory building in Wikipedia: The case of North African uprisings“.
In the paper, we highlight the intense edit activity by Wikipedians on articles related to protests and uprisings in North African countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen focusing mainly on the Egyptian revolution.
We cast the phenomenon as a process of collective memory building in which thousands of Wikipedia editors were involved as the traumatic events unfolded.
We explore and suggest possible directions for quantitative research on collective memory formation of traumatic and controversial events in Wikipedia.
I’m in a Wikisym session titled “Wikipedia as a Global Phenomenon” in which I will have the pleasure to speak after Brian Keegan that is addressing the same topic of how on Wikipedia it is possible to analyze how editors cover recent events in real time; the paper is “Dynamics, Practices, and Structures in Wikipedia’s Coverage of the T?hoku Catastrophes” (joint work with D. Gergle, N. Contractor).
Probably at Wikisym there will be also people from Ushahidi, such as Heather Ford, which recently announced WikiSweeper, a joint project with the Wikimedia Foundation to track breaking news trends on Wikipedia so I think we will have wonderful exchanges of points of views and possibly future collaborations.
I’m really looking forward for what looks like a fabolous conference!

Credit: The image on top is Creative Commons BY-SA.

P.S.: At Wikisym I’m also going to demo our web tool on comparing points of view of different language communities of Wikipedia, i.e. Manypedia.

sonet

FBK researcher awarded by Google with 50,000 dollars and … emotion ;)

Sep 30th

Posted by paolo in sonet

No comments

One of my colleague at Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK) in Trento, Carlo Strapparava, was awarded with $50,000 by Google as an incentive to continue his research, especially with the participation of young researchers. Carlo proposed algorithms for distinguishing some of the nuances and emotions expressed in written language.

Dealing with the emotional, persuasive, or other aspects of creative language content in the texts – Strapparava explains- is commonly considered to be off limits for any computational ability. Actually, these features are a key part of communicating, and it is important that research in the field of natural language processing deal with it. The usefulness of automatic recognition of these aspects is nowadays even greater, given the enormous daily production of texts on the web. Through these technologies, it will also be possible to predict the emotional or persuasive content of a text.

Congrats Carlo!

sonet

WikiRevolutions: Wikipedia as a Lens for Studying the Real-Time Formation of Collective Memories of Revolutions

Sep 16th

Posted by Michela in articles

No comments

CAIRO, EGYPT - FEBRUARY 08:  Anti-government p...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Recently, Paolo Massa and I wrote an article proposing to study Wikipedia as a place were people actively build the collective memory of revolutions, discussing highly different perspectives and points of view. Focusing mainly on the Egyptian revolution, we reported statistics showing the richness of data available on the many language versions of Wikipedia, and pieces of discussions among editors.

The article was published on an interesting special issue dedicated to the Arab Spring, on the International Journal of Communication (edited by Manuel Castells and Larry Gross).

Paolo will also present our research directions at WikiSym 2011 (7th International Conference on Wikis and Open Collaboration, October 3-5, 2011 | Mountain View, California), in the session about “Wikipedia as a Global Phenomenon” (see the full schedule).

Enhanced by Zemanta

sonet

The Behavior of Wiki Users

Sep 15th

Posted by Asta in Uncategorized

No comments

Authors: Shu, Wesley; Chuang, Yu-Hao

Source: Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, Volume 39, Number 6, 2011 , pp. 851-864(14)

 

Scholars conducted an interview that aimed at revealing the factors that influence the users to use wiki technology. The study was based on the theory of acceptance and use of technology (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003). A survey was conducted with N=243 participants –  predominantly from Taiwan orChina. The survey was sent toonline communities, chat rooms, and online bulletin boards. The questionnaire,accompanied by an email message, was also sent to Wikipedia users.

Demographics of the respondents was composed of 87% of men and 13% of women.50% of the respondents were from 20-25 age group. The results of the study revealed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, and user involvement have a positive effect on the intention to use wikis. These results are consistent with those gained in studies of other technologies.The most prominent predictor in all these studies has been user involvement;it had the greatest explanatory power in our study, indicated by the size of thecorrelation and its statistical significance. This proves that wikis are “customer-centric”and require greater user involvement to guarantee their success becauseof their decentralized and collaborative nature. Social influence was not a significant predictor in our study of the intentionto use wikis.

Scholars argue that the study has broader implications  - this study results exemplify the current trend of users playing an increasingly important role in web-based content creation.

 

predictors, user behavior, wikis

Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons

Sep 14th

Posted by Asta in Uncategorized

No comments

Callahan, E. S. and Herring, S. C. (2011), Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62: 1899–1915. doi: 10.1002/asi.21577

 

The article creation in Wikipedia claims to strictly follow “neutral point of view” (NPOV) policy. The open questions that regards article creation, is to what extent this is true in Wikipedia articles across Wikipedias in different languages? This question was posed by Ewa S. Callahan and Susan C. Herring who conducted a study that compared famous people in the domains of sports, politics, music, movies, and academe, religion by using two methodologies – structural content analysis and thematic analysis.

Structural analysis revealed that  biographical entries analyzed are much (nearly 11 times) longer than average Wikipedia articles in both languages. The entries about Americans are overall almost 10 times longer in English than in Polish, whereas the entries about Poles are more equal in length in both languages.

Entries on Polish subjects in Polish had the most photos, followed by entries on Americans in English; the English entry on Theodore Roosevelt also included two videos.

Overall, the distribution of content across the four categories is roughly proportional to article length. The only feature that patterns in a way reminiscent of own- versus other-culture is list of accomplishments; these are found more in own-culture entries, although they are not very common overall. Additionally, categories of “other information” were favored by English-language sidebars; they occur hardly at all in Polish-language entries.

The thematic variables included the tone of the overall content coverage; type of information included (personal, career, other); mentions of education; mentions of nationality; mentions of political ideology (two variables: communism/socialism and democracy); mentions of controversy; and types of controversies mentioned (personal vs. career related).

Entries about Americans were more positive in tone overall in both languages, especially in Polish, where all-positive or mostly positive content was found in 93% of entries.

Entries about Americans in English include the most personal information; they are more likely to include “a lot” and far more likely to include a “moderate” amount of personal information than any of the other three nationality–language categories.

The scholars conclude the analysis as follows:

 

  • Famous Americans overall receive more positive coverage, as well as being more associated with personal relationships, personal controversy (especially about romance and sexual lifestyle), nonfamily other information (e.g., about health), and democracy.
  • Famous Poles receive more balanced coverage (more mentions of adversity), as well as more mentions of nationality, career controversies, and communism.

Finally, there are differences relating to language version:

  • English language entries have more references and external links, as well as an overall more positive tone, a greater diversity of information, and more mentions of controversy. They also tend to be longer than Polish language entries.
  • Polish language entries are more likely to include information about professional accomplishments and personal life only, without mentioning other types of information.

Read more about this research: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.indiana.edu/doi/10.1002/asi.21577/full

http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/callahan.herring.2011.pdf

 

biographies on Wikipedia, cross-language comparison, polish Wikipedia
12345»102030...Last »
  • Recent Posts

    • MIT Press book “The Reputation Society” (containing a chapter by me) is out!
    • Article about Manypedia on Italian newspaper Corriere
    • Paolo’s presentation at WikiSym 2011
    • My presentation at Wikisym: studying (current) history by analyzing Wikipedia
    • WikiTrip: animated visualization over time of gender and geo-location of Wikipedians who edited a page
  • Tags

    Asta Zelenkauskaite barnstars classification collaboration value conference conferences coordination cross-language comparison deletions discussion forums facebook Flickr IADIS image search internal kleinberg media meeting network analysis paper paper awards presentation qualitative analysis recommender system redaction Research roles slides social social network social network analysis social roles sonet sonet social networkin talk page term analysis trust user contributions user page users Web 2.0 Wiki wikinews wiki wikipedia wikipedia Wikipedia user profiles
  • Archives

    • January 2012
    • November 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2006
  • My latest tweets

    Loading tweets...
    Follow me on Twitter!
  •  

    January 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov    
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
Mystique theme by digitalnature | Powered by WordPress
RSS Feeds XHTML 1.1 Top